Artikel

Nervous System Stuck In Fight-Or-Flight: Understanding the Survival Mode and Return to Regulation

Nurosym

Nurosym

Nurosym Content Team
Educational Content

Developed by a multidisciplinary medical content team, this material translates validated research on bioelectronic and neuromodulation approaches into clear and clinically grounded information.

Periods of sustained stress can push the body into survival mode, a state in which alertness becomes the default and the nervous system has difficulty returning to rest and regulation. When a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight develops, this response may persist beyond the period of actual threat. While this response is protective in the short term, modern stressors are rarely brief or clearly resolved. As a result, the nervous system may remain biased toward  fight-or-flight even when no immediate threat is present1,2.

Understanding how to exit survival mode requires looking beyond mindset or willpower toward the underlying physiology of the autonomic nervous system. This article explores the fight-or-flight mode meaning from a scientific perspective, explains why the nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight can persist, and outlines evidence-informed approaches that support parasympathetic regulation, including sound, breathing, sensory cues, and modern neuromodulation through non-invasive, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)3,4.

A Nervous System Stuck in Fight-or-Flight Is a Physiological Response, Not a Personal Failing

The fight-or-flight response is mediated by the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system, which controls automatic bodily functions that operate without conscious control. When a potential threat is detected, sympathetic activity increases heart rate, redirects blood flow to skeletal muscles, sharpens attention, and suppresses non-essential processes such as digestion⁵.

In healthy regulation, sympathetic activation is followed by a return to baseline through parasympathetic activity. However, repeated or unresolved stressors, such as ongoing cognitive load, emotional strain, disrupted sleep, illness, or environmental instability, may prevent this recovery phase from fully engaging6,7. Over time, the nervous system may recalibrate its baseline toward vigilance, resulting in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

In this context, being “stuck” reflects a pattern of autonomic imbalance rather than weakness or lack of resilience. A nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight represents a physiological pattern rather than a personal failing8.

Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Systems: Balance Over Suppression

The autonomic nervous system operates through two interdependent branches:

  • The sympathetic nervous system, which supports mobilisation, alertness, and energy expenditure.
  • The parasympathetic nervous system, which supports rest, digestion, cardiovascular regulation, immune signalling, and recovery9.

Healthy regulation depends on the nervous system’s ability to move flexibly between these states rather than remaining dominated by one. When sympathetic activity remains elevated for a prolonged period, this flexibility can diminish, making it harder for the system to downregulate even in environments that are no longer threatening10. Under these conditions, a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight may persist despite environmental safety.

In research settings, autonomic flexibility is assessed using multiple physiological markers. One commonly used indicator is heart rate variability (HRV), which captures variations in the time interval between heartbeats. Lower HRV is more often observed when a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight limits autonomic adaptability during prolonged stress, persistent fatigue, and low mood11,12,13.

However, HRV represents only one window into autonomic function and is typically interpreted alongside other measures, including breathing patterns, blood pressure regulation, and baroreflex sensitivity.

The Vagus Nerve and Parasympathetic Regulation

Central to parasympathetic function is the vagus nerve, the longest cranial nerve in the body. It carries sensory information from organs such as the heart, lungs, and gut to the brainstem and plays a major role in regulating cardiovascular rhythm, respiratory patterns, inflammatory signalling, and stress recovery¹⁴.

Reduced vagal activity has been associated with lower HRV and diminished capacity to shift out of heightened arousal. Importantly, vagal signalling is largely afferent, meaning it conveys information from the body to the brain, influencing how safety and threat are interpreted at a physiological level15,16. Reduced vagal tone is commonly observed in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

For individuals exploring how to get out of a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight, approaches that support vagal pathways have therefore become an area of growing scientific interest17.

Why Survival Mode Can Persist

Survival mode rarely develops in response to a single event. More often, it emerges gradually through the accumulation of repeated demands on the nervous system, sometimes over months or years18. This gradual accumulation is characteristic of a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight rather than an acute stress response.

Common contributing factors include:
 • Prolonged psychological stress without adequate recovery
 • Repeated exposure to uncertainty or lack of predictability
 • Disrupted circadian rhythms and sleep irregularity
 • Physical illness or post-viral stressors
 • Reduced exposure to cues associated with safety and rest19,20

In these contexts, the nervous system may continue to prioritise alertness even when external conditions no longer require it. This persistence reflects adaptive learning at the level of the autonomic system and is a defining feature of a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight rather than conscious choice21.

Figure: Prolonged nervous-system activation can affect the body as a whole. Rather than appearing as a single symptom, survival mode often manifests across emotional, cognitive, physical, and behavioural domains. In some cases, this state may be linked to a Pinched Vagus Nerve in the Neck, reflecting a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight that remains oriented toward alertness and protection even when immediate threats are no longer present.

Shift Out of Nervous System Stuck In Fight-Or-Flight

Shifting out of survival mode typically does not occur through a single action or technique. Instead, it reflects the cumulative effect of repeated signals that support safety, predictability, and regulation—a process particularly relevant when vagus nerve compression symptoms are present in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Breathing and Rhythm

Breathing patterns directly influence autonomic balance. Slow, regular breathing has been shown to enhance parasympathetic markers and improve HRV  in both healthy individuals and clinical populations22,23. These effects may provide stabilising input for a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight, unfolding gradually and relying on consistency rather than intensity or effort.

Sensory Input and Sound

The nervous system continuously interprets sensory information. Calming, low-arousal auditory input characterised by a slow tempo, stable rhythm, minimal dynamic variation, and limited abrupt changes - features commonly found in ambient or lo-fi styles - has therefore been explored as a means of reducing background sympathetic activation. This approach may be especially supportive for a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Research suggests that such auditory input can influence cardiovascular and respiratory parameters associated with parasympathetic activity24,25. While not a standalone intervention, sound can contribute to an overall regulatory environment when used consistently and predictably26.

Movement and Somatic Input

Gentle movement and touch-based practices provide bottom-up sensory input that can support autonomic regulation. Approaches such as slow yoga, intuitive movement, stretching, or massage introduce rhythm and sustained pressure - stimuli that have been associated with modest reductions in sympathetic markers and corresponding increases in parasympathetic activity27,28. These predictable, non-threatening physical sensations can help signal safety to a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Auricular Pathways and Neuromodulation

Beyond behavioural and sensory approaches, interest has grown in methods that support parasympathetic signalling more directly, particularly in individuals with a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight. The auricular branch of the vagus nerve provides a unique, non-invasive access point to vagal afferent fibres at the outer ear. These fibres project to brainstem regions involved in autonomic regulation, including the nucleus tractus solitarius29,30.

Low-level electrical stimulation at this site has been shown in clinical studies to influence autonomic markers such as HRV and baroreflex sensitivity31,32. This has led to the development of wearable systems such as Nurosym, designed to support parasympathetic signalling through non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), particularly where a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight reflects prolonged autonomic imbalance.

Used consistently, this approach aims to reinforce the nervous system’s capacity to shift out of prolonged activation by supporting the pathways involved in physiological regulation rather than suppressing stress responses outright in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Nurosym and Parasympathetic Support

A Certified, Non-Invasive Wearable System

Developed by Parasym, Nurosym is a CE-mark certified non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation wearable system in the European Union, engineered to meet established safety and performance standards for wearable vagus nerve stimulation devices.

Nurosym combines stimulation parameters aligned with those used in peer-reviewed studies with a practical, ear-based design intended for everyday use. Unlike neck-based systems, it does not require conductive gel, simplifying daily use and travel. Stimulation remains at sensory, non-painful levels and is delivered through the auricular branch of the vagus nerve - an access point widely studied in autonomic research33, particularly in the context of a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Precision Control and Everyday Usability

A distinguishing feature of Nurosym is its high degree of application control. The system offers 45 adjustable intensity levels, allowing vagus nerve stimulator to be tailored to individual sensitivity and changing needs over time, including those associated with a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight

Session duration can be adapted from shorter sessions to longer or continuous stimulation, supporting flexible use across different routines and regulatory strategies. This level of adjustability allows the system to be used conservatively at low intensities or more persistently as part of a structured autonomic-support routine for individuals with a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Evidence Aligned With Autonomic Regulation

Across clinical studies conducted on auricular transcutaneous vagal stimulation, protocols aligned with Nurosym’s parameters have been associated with measurable changes in physiological markers, alongside changes in low mood, anxious states, fatigue severity, sleep-quality scores, cognitive performance, and inflammatory markers linked to autonomic imbalance31,32,33,34,35,36 - patterns commonly observed in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

61% Increase in Vagal Activity, 48% Reduction in Fatigue, and 31% Improvement in Sleep Quality

In relevant adult study populations, independent research has reported measurable changes across multiple autonomic and recovery-related outcome measures following auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation with Nurosym. These include increases in markers associated with vagal activity of up to approximately 61%, reductions in fatigue-related scores of up to approximately 48%, and improvements in sleep quality scores of up to approximately 31%, with observed effects varying by cohort characteristics, outcome definition, and stimulation protocol32,33,34,35,36.

45% Improvement in Mood-Related Outcomes and 35% Reduction in Anxious Thoughts

In addition to physiological effects, clinical studies have reported improvements in mood-related outcome measures of up to approximately 45%, alongside reductions in anxious thought patterns of up to approximately 35%. These changes are consistent with improved autonomic regulation and nervous system flexibility rather than direct mood alteration35,36.

These findings derive from a growing body of peer-reviewed research conducted by independent academic and clinical groups across Europe and the United States, encompassing more than 50 completed studies addressing physiological features relevant to a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Figure: Measured reductions in anxiety-related scores following Nurosym use, as assessed by the Burns Anxiety Inventory. The picture shows a significant decrease from baseline to post-intervention, with lower scores maintained at follow-up, reflecting how targeted, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation with Nurosym may help support stress regulation and anxiety resilience over time in individuals with a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Safety, Scale, and Real-World Use

Nurosym has been used in real-world settings, with more than 4 million user sessions completed globally. This breadth of use contributes to an expanding evidence base on safety, tolerability, and long-term usability across diverse user profiles31,34, including those experiencing a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Within a broader regulation-focused approach, Nurosym is being explored as a tool that may help support the nervous system’s ability to shift away from prolonged sympathetic activation and toward more adaptive parasympathetic regulation in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight, particularly when used consistently and alongside other supportive strategies.


What Regulation Typically Looks Like in Practice

Shifting out of survival mode rarely produces sudden or dramatic changes. More often, regulation appears as small, gradual shifts in how the nervous system responds to everyday demands in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight. These may include:

  • Easier transitions into rest

  • Reduced baseline tension

  • Improved tolerance of everyday stressors

  • More stable sleep-wake rhythms

Importantly, regulation does not mean the absence of stress, but an increased ability to recover from activation and return toward balance in a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight.

Reframing Survival Mode

Survival mode reflects a nervous system prioritising protection in response to sustained demand. From a physiological perspective, a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight is neither a failure nor a fixed state, but an adaptive pattern shaped over time. Moving out of survival mode, therefore, depends on repeated signals that support regulation rather than attempts to suppress stress responses.

Approaches that emphasise predictability and consistency, such as breathing, sensory input, gentle movement, and engagement of parasympathetic pathways, align closely with how the autonomic nervous system adapts. Tools like Nurosym, designed to support parasympathetic signalling through non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), offer a practical way to reinforce nervous-system regulation in everyday life for individuals with a nervous system stuck in fight-or-flight

Reframing survival mode in this way shifts the focus away from “fixing” the nervous system and toward working with its underlying design, supporting a gradual return to autonomic flexibility over time.

*Percentage changes reflect study-specific outcome measures and are not indicative of individual results.

References


  1. McEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(3):873–904.

  2. Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, et al. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Compr Physiol. 2016;6(2):603–621.

  3. Thayer JF, Lane RD. Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(2):81–88.

  4. Farmer AD, Strzelczyk A, Finisguerra A, et al. International consensus based review and recommendations for minimum reporting standards in research on transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:568051.

  5. Cannon WB. The wisdom of the body. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 1932.

  6. Juster RP, McEwen BS, Lupien SJ. Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;35(1):2–16.

  7. Slavich GM. Social safety theory: a biologically based evolutionary perspective on life stress, health, and behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020;16:265–295.

  8. Porges SW. The polyvagal perspective. Biol Psychol. 2007;74(2):116–143.

  9. Floras JS, Ponikowski P. The sympathetic/parasympathetic imbalance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(30):1974–1982.

  10. Thayer JF, Yamamoto SS, Brosschot JF. The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;74(2):95–101.

  11. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043–1065.

  12. Bernardi L, De Barbieri G, Rosengård-Bärlund M, et al. New method to measure and improve consistency of baroreflex sensitivity values. Clin Auton Res. 2010;20(6):353–361.

  13. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Psychol. 2017;8:213.

  14. Breit S, Kupferberg A, Rogler G, Hasler G. Vagus nerve as modulator of the brain–gut axis in psychiatric and inflammatory disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:44.

  15. Butt MF, Albusoda A, Farmer AD, Aziz Q. The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. J Anat. 2020;236(4):588–611.

  16. Frangos E, Ellrich J, Komisaruk BR. Non-invasive access to the vagus nerve central projections via electrical stimulation of the external ear: fMRI evidence in humans. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(3):624–636.

  17. Giannoni A, Gentile F, Passino C. Bioelectronic medicine and its applications in cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(46):4453–4455.

  18. McEwen BS, Akil H. Revisiting the stress concept: implications for affective disorders. J Neurosci. 2020;40(1):12–21.

  19. Walker WH, Walton JC, DeVries AC, Nelson RJ. Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21(9):1–16.

  20. Slavich GM, Irwin MR. From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(3):774–815.

  21. Sterling P, Eyer J. Allostasis: a new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In: Fisher S, Reason J, editors. Handbook of life stress, cognition and health. New York: Wiley; 1988. p. 629–649.

  22. Lehrer PM, Vaschillo E, Vaschillo B. Resonant frequency biofeedback training to increase cardiac variability. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003;28(1):97–109.

  23. Zaccaro A, Piarulli A, Laurino M, et al. How breath-control can change your life: a systematic review on psycho-physiological correlates of slow breathing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;95:582–593.

  24. Bernardi L, Porta C, Sleight P. Cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory changes induced by different types of music. Circulation. 2006;114(20):209–216.

  25. Thoma MV, La Marca R, Brönnimann R, et al. The effect of music on the human stress response. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70156.

  26. Koelsch S. Music-evoked emotions: principles, brain correlates, and implications for therapy. Brain Cogn. 2015;89:80–89.

  27. Field T. Massage therapy research review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016;24:19–31.

  28. Streeter CC, Gerbarg PL, Saper RB, et al. Effects of yoga on the autonomic nervous system, gamma-aminobutyric-acid, and allostasis. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;18(12):1145–1152.

  29. Antonino D, Teixeira AL, Maia-Lopes PM, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation acutely improves spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(5):875–881.

  30. Bretherton B, Atkinson L, Murray A, et al. Effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in individuals aged 55 years or above. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(14):4836–4857.

  31. Nagai M, Dote K, Kato M, et al. Blood pressure variability after non-invasive low-level tragus stimulation in acute heart failure. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024;17(6):1347–1352.

  32. Gentile F, Giannoni A, Navari A, et al. Acute right-sided transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improves cardio-vagal baroreflex gain in patients with chronic heart failure. Clin Auton Res. 2025;35(1):75–85.

  33. Stavrakis S, Elkholey K, Morris L, et al. Neuromodulation of inflammation to treat heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(10):e023582.

  34. Dalle Luche G, Dundovic S, Stavrakis S, et al. First report of safety and tolerability of low-level tragus vagal neuromodulation in cardiovascular patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(13 Suppl A):178.

  35. Zheng Z, et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improves Long COVID symptoms in a female cohort: a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2024.

  36. Verbanck P, et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) can reverse the manifestations of the Long-COVID syndrome: a pilot study. Adv Neurol Neurosci Res. 2021.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Nurosym is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Always consult a qualified health professional for personalised guidance.

Zurück zum Blog